HS2- cost vs benefits Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

herpes simplex 2- cost vs benefits - Dissertation ExampleTABLE 1 Report of HSR Documents in the UK twelvemonth REPORT AUTHOR KEY NOTES February, 2004 High Speed Rail International comparisons Commission for Integrated Transport (CfIT) Geographical and demographic factors created differences in international markets. The stream railway network in Britains network was in order. The rail network capacity was good. 2005 High Speed Line require WS Atkins A bode made on overcrowding of lines. There was need for investment in HSR with a check on economic case. 2016 proposed as the opening date for the project. December, 2006 The Eddington Transport Study Sir Rod Eddington The long distance links never provided better connectivity in relation to the local connections that are short distanced. Doubts on real benefits of HSR considered. HSR could not reduce atomic number 6 emission. Other viable options for transport in long distances considered of lower costs than HSR. June, 2007 HS2 Prop osition, the WCRL corridor Greengauge21 Due to capacity shortfall, HS2 proposed as the best option to bat the crisis. The costs earlier predicted about HSR seen as not logical. HSR network offered a continuation for HS1. A growth predicted on demand for WCML which will boost connection in the corridor and boost economic growth. January, 2009 High Speed Two Department for Transport The new government to consider construction of HS2. HS2 Company to be created so that it deals with network planning. HSR to address the problem of overcrowding. September, 2009 The case for new lines Network Rail A network configuration and service pattern proposal created. capital of the United Kingdom was considered to be the main area in focus. WCML was the first HST alignment to be built. September, 2009 A step forward Greengauge21... This research will begin with the background acquaintance on high speed rail. The high speed rail entered the UK in 2007 following the completion of Channel Tunnel to London. It was called Channel Tunnel Rail Link, before long referred to as High-Speed 1 or HS1. A political consensus on the construction of HSR network in UK for trains running with a maximum speed of 350 kmph is currently preferred. The next project is the construction of High Speed 2 that will connect London and the northern parts of UK. According to UK transport policy, HS2 is viewed as the most appropriate mode of transport for the region in relation to the increased demand for rail network and transport. An extensive study on the political platform in the year 2004 by different countries in the world revealed that UK had not implemented the High-Speed rail. Other countries like Germany, Japan, France and Spain had already adopted it. The study revealed that UK had not seen the need for High-Speed rail because of demand in the transport sector. The available modes of transport were in a position to hold the capacity. Several reports drawn from the knock back show that a gro wing demand for rail transport cannot be met with the current network and therefore a viable solution should be desire to hold the situation. A further forecast for the future has enhanced its implementation. The reason backing HS2 was lack of capacity in UK rail network. The proposal for HS2 by Rail Network was after careful consideration on possible alternatives using WCML alignment.